Hurt in an Uber or Lyft crash in Maine? The rideshare company's insurance may apply depending on whether the driver was logged off, waiting for a ride, or on a trip.
GetAccidentLawyerNow is not a law firm. We can try to connect you with an independent attorney licensed in Maine.
Want the full method first? See how the Maine case value calculator works.
Maine's six-year statute of limitations under 14 M.R.S. § 752 applies to rideshare injury claims just as it does to any personal injury action. That extended filing window is one of the longest in the country and gives injured claimants time to understand the full scope of their injuries before settling. But rideshare cases have a unique evidence problem: the trip data, timestamps, and driver status information that prove which insurance tier was active at the moment of the crash are held exclusively by Uber and Lyft on their corporate servers. Without a formal preservation demand — and, if necessary, a subpoena — that data is subject to the company's internal retention policies, which are not designed to protect your interests. The critical first step in any Maine rideshare crash is sending a written preservation letter to the TNC demanding retention of all trip data, driver status logs, GPS routing, driver communications, and internal incident reports. The six-year statute protects your right to file; preserving the TNC's data protects your ability to prove the case.
Under 24-A M.R.S. § 7303, Maine's TNC insurance tiers work as follows: During Period 1 (app on, no ride matched), the TNC must provide contingent liability coverage of at least 50/100/25 plus UM/UIM and medical payments coverage. During Period 2 (ride matched, driver en route to pickup) and Period 3 (passenger in vehicle), coverage jumps to $1,000,000 in combined single-limit liability plus UM/UIM and medical payments coverage. The difference between Period 1 and Period 2 is the difference between a $100,000 policy ceiling and a $1,000,000 one. Insurers for the TNC will aggressively argue that the driver was in Period 1 — or even Period 0, app off entirely — to push liability onto the driver's personal auto policy, which may exclude TNC activity. The timestamps and driver-status data from the Uber or Lyft platform are the only evidence that conclusively resolves this dispute, which is why preserving that data is the single most important early action in a Maine rideshare case.
Maine's modified comparative negligence rule under 14 M.R.S. § 156 applies to rideshare crash claims. If you are found 50% or more at fault, you recover nothing; below 50%, your recovery is reduced by your fault percentage. For passengers, comparative fault is rarely an issue — a passenger in the back seat of an Uber almost always has a clean liability position against the at-fault driver (whether that is the TNC driver, another motorist, or both). For other motorists hit by a rideshare vehicle, the TNC's insurer will attempt to attribute fault to you. The statute is silent on employment classification for TNC drivers, which means Uber and Lyft maintain the position that drivers are independent contractors. This limits direct vicarious liability claims against the TNC companies themselves, but it does not affect your access to the TNC's commercial insurance policy, which is the primary recovery source in Period 2 and Period 3 crashes. The insurer on the $1,000,000 policy pays regardless of the driver's employment classification.
If the rideshare crash involved a government-maintained road or occurred on public property — a pothole on Congress Street in Portland, a poorly lit municipal parking lot in Bangor, an icy state highway that was not treated — a claim against the governmental entity may supplement the TNC insurance recovery. But 14 M.R.S. § 8107 requires a written notice of claim within 365 days to preserve a tort action against a governmental entity. That one-year notice deadline runs inside Maine's six-year statute of limitations, and missing it eliminates the government defendant permanently. In a rideshare case where the TNC's insurance tier is disputed or where the Period 1 minimum of 50/100/25 is the only coverage available, adding a government defendant with its own liability exposure can be the difference between an adequate recovery and an underinsured one. An attorney who handles the § 8107 notice, the TNC data preservation demand, and the insurance-tier analysis simultaneously is protecting every available recovery channel from day one.
Legal Information Notice
The legal information on this page is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and every case is different. Always consult with a licensed attorney in your state to verify the current law and how it applies to your specific situation.
It depends entirely on the driver's status at the moment of impact. Under 24-A M.R.S. § 7303: Period 0 (app off) — the driver's personal auto policy only; Period 1 (app on, no ride matched) — TNC contingent coverage at 50/100/25 plus UM/UIM and med pay; Period 2 (ride matched, en route to pickup) — TNC commercial policy at $1,000,000 plus UM/UIM and med pay; Period 3 (passenger in vehicle) — same $1,000,000 TNC policy. The TNC's platform data is the only evidence that conclusively establishes which period was active.
The Maine TNC statute (29-A M.R.S. §§ 1671-1676) is silent on driver employment classification, and both Uber and Lyft classify drivers as independent contractors to shield themselves from vicarious liability. Direct negligence claims against the TNC — for negligent screening, hiring, or vehicle inspection — are theoretically available but face significant procedural hurdles. The practical recovery path is through the TNC's commercial insurance policy, which provides $1,000,000 in coverage during Periods 2 and 3 regardless of the driver's employment status.
Passengers are in the strongest legal position. During Period 3, the TNC's $1,000,000 commercial policy under 24-A M.R.S. § 7303 applies whether the rideshare driver was at fault or another motorist caused the crash. As a passenger, you have a clean liability case against the at-fault driver — comparative fault under 14 M.R.S. § 156 almost never applies to a backseat passenger. You can also recover against both the TNC's policy and the other driver's personal auto policy if both drivers share fault.
Top priority: screenshots of your trip receipt and the driver's profile from the Uber or Lyft app — these establish timestamps that determine which insurance period applies. Also critical: the in-app GPS route, any driver messages, the police report, and dashcam footage if available. Send a written preservation letter to Uber or Lyft's corporate legal department within days demanding retention of all trip data, driver status logs, GPS routing, and internal incident reports. Without that letter, the platform data is subject to corporate retention schedules that are not designed to preserve your evidence.
The Secretary of State's office regulates TNC operations under 29-A M.R.S. §§ 1671-1676, including driver permits and vehicle requirements. Each TNC pays a $10,000 annual fee under 29-A M.R.S. § 1672. The insurance requirements are separately codified under 24-A M.R.S. chapter 89 (§ 7303), administered by the Bureau of Insurance. This dual regulatory structure means compliance failures on either the operations side or the insurance side can create additional liability theories beyond ordinary negligence.
All legal information on this page is sourced from primary government statutes. Last verified 2026-04-07.
24-A M.R.S. § 7303
TNC Insurance Requirements (Period 1 / Period 2 / Period 3 floors, UM/UIM, first-dollar gap rule)
24-A M.R.S. § 7302
TNC Definitions (Digital Network, Personal Vehicle, Prearranged Ride, TNC, TNC Driver, TNC Rider)
29-A M.R.S. § 1672
TNC Permit Requirement ($10,000 Annual Fee; Secretary of State)
29-A M.R.S. § 1673
TNC Insurance Requirement (Cross-Reference to 24-A § 7303)
14 M.R.S. § 752
6-Year General Civil / Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
P.L. 2015, c. 279
An Act To Establish Transportation Network Company Insurance (enacting law)
In-depth articles relevant to your rideshare accident lawyer case.
Uber or Lyft Accident: What to Do and Who Pays
Injured in an Uber or Lyft accident? Learn who is liable, what insurance covers your claim, and steps to protect your rights.
How to Deal With Insurance Companies After an Accident (2026 Guide)
Learn how to deal with insurance adjusters after an accident. Avoid common traps, protect your claim, and maximize your settlement.
How Long Does a Personal Injury Case Take? (2026 Timeline)
Understand the typical timeline of a personal injury case from filing to settlement. Learn what factors speed up or delay your claim.
Different type of accident? We connect victims with attorneys across all six practice areas.
GetAccidentLawyerNow is an attorney matching service. We don’t give legal advice, and using the site doesn’t create an attorney-client relationship.
Deadlines and fault rules on this page link to the statute or court decision they come from.
Requesting a review is free and there’s no obligation to hire anyone. Fee terms are set by the attorney.
Don't wait. The 6 years statute of limitations is ticking.
Call (267) 212-1034 Now*Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.